BEGIN:VCALENDAR
VERSION:2.0
PRODID:Linklings LLC
BEGIN:VTIMEZONE
TZID:Europe/Stockholm
X-LIC-LOCATION:Europe/Stockholm
BEGIN:DAYLIGHT
TZOFFSETFROM:+0100
TZOFFSETTO:+0200
TZNAME:CEST
DTSTART:19700308T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=3;BYDAY=-1SU
END:DAYLIGHT
BEGIN:STANDARD
TZOFFSETFROM:+0200
TZOFFSETTO:+0100
TZNAME:CET
DTSTART:19701101T020000
RRULE:FREQ=YEARLY;BYMONTH=10;BYDAY=-1SU
END:STANDARD
END:VTIMEZONE
BEGIN:VEVENT
DTSTAMP:20220812T074357Z
LOCATION:Samarkand Room
DTSTART;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20220628T110000
DTEND;TZID=Europe/Stockholm:20220628T130000
UID:submissions.pasc-conference.org_PASC22_sess145@linklings.com
SUMMARY:MS3B - Research Software Science: Applying the Scientific Method t
 o Understand and Improve How We Develop, Maintain, and Use Software for Re
 search (Part I)
DESCRIPTION:Minisymposium\n\nThe discipline of scientific software develop
 ment, maintenance and use has incorporated an increasing diversity of skil
 ls. Early products were typically developed by single "heroes" or small te
 ams of domain experts. More recently, teams have increasingly included com
 puter science and mathematics expertise to improve algorithmic choice and 
 implementation, and software engineering expertise to improve software des
 ign, use of tools and new workflows. In addition to factors associated wit
 h individual software teams, software ecosystems (based on software stacks
 , disciplines, and/or other community identification) have become more pre
 valent and visible, with common policies, practices, and priorities across
  teams and a broad interest in sustaining developer and user communities. 
 For community open source projects, community engagement expertise is also
  needed. This responsibility can be an explicit team role for large projec
 ts, but for smaller projects is more often an additional role that one or 
 more developers take on. In this minisymposium we explore both possible an
 d demonstrated successes resulting from introducing expertise in social an
 d cognitive sciences, organizational psychology, community development and
  policies, and other human factors fields.\n\nIncentives and Frictions in 
 Community Software Projects\n\nKatz\n\nResearch software is pervasive in r
 esearch today; most research is dependent on software. Much of this resear
 ch software is built and maintained by communities. And most of the commun
 ities have or develop a strong voluntary aspect, at least over time, parti
 cularly because any one funding award for r...\n\n---------------------\nA
 n Overview of Research Software Science Approaches\n\nHeroux\n\n<em>Resear
 ch Software Science</em> is defined as applying the scientific method to u
 nderstand and improve how software is developed and used in research. Rese
 arch Software Scientist (RSS) activities have been present in the scientif
 ic software community for many years but seldom with distinct goals ...\n\
 n---------------------\nResearch Software Alliance - The Role of Policy in
  Research Software\n\nBarker\n\nThe Research Software Alliance (ReSA) util
 ises social science frameworks to achieve its mission of bringing research
  software communities together to collaborate on the advancement of the re
 search software ecosystem. Frameworks focused on achieving system change a
 nd community engagement are most rel...\n\n---------------------\nUndersta
 nding the Economy of Open-Source Software Development Communities\n\nCohoo
 n\n\nOpen-source software in science often has no price tag for users. Inc
 reasing attention has therefore turned to understanding how open-source wo
 rk can be sustained without traditional fees. Sociotechnical infrastructur
 e studies approach this topic by considering how resources of all types ar
 e leverag...\n\n\nDomain: Computer Science and Applied Mathematics, Humani
 ties and Social Sciences, Engineering
END:VEVENT
END:VCALENDAR